We use cookies to ensure we give you the best experience on our site. If you continue without changing your settings, we assume
you're happy to receive all cookies on this site. If you would like to, you can manually change your cookie settings at any time.
MSI Australia & New Zealand - Global Site Memberlink Login

By Richard Cowen, Tucker & Cowen, Solicitors, Brisbane

MSI - KPI's contractsMost parties enter into a contract with one thing in mind – ‘what outcome do I want when the contract is complete?’ The answer is often something tangible such as ownership of plant and equipment or intellectual property. What purchasers commonly overlook is how they want their business, or the asset, to function after the contract is complete.

When negotiating the terms of a contract, it is equally (if not more) important that the purchaser considers the end result they want to achieve by acquiring an asset. This is especially the case for contracts including computer hardware or software. Failing which, the purchaser may be left with an asset which is not capable of performing the tasks the purchaser had purchased the asset for in the first place. This is potentially an extremely expensive mistake – just ask the Queensland Government about its Health department payroll system!

To ensure that the purchaser has a right to return, or require further work from the vendor of the asset, we recommend that contracts in the technology or software sphere include specific performance objectives or criteria that are required to be met upon completion of the purchase.

Examples of performance objectives may, for example, include matters such as the ability to:-

  • permit multiple users simultaneous access to a computer program, with any access restrictions (such as a capped limit of users) allowing for the growth of the purchaser’s business;
  • store of a minimum data limit, with the ability to increase the limit of an existing system;
  • conduct appropriate performance testing in a “live” environment to ensure it meets the required operational standards in the real world; and
  • have independent expert approval to ensure that the purchaser’s performance standards are met.

This is particularly important in contracts for the supply or upgrade of technology where, if the performance objectives are not met, then the purchaser will be unable to utilise the asset fully, or at all.

A key benefit of incorporating performance objectives into a contract is that it provides the purchaser with the ability to recover any damages suffered where there is a failure to meet those objectives. In the absence of express performance objectives in the contract, the purchaser may not have any rights against the vendor where the asset does not meet the requirements of the purchaser, unless the purchaser is able to rely on Australian Consumer Law, which can be a costly and lengthy process.

We strongly recommend that the objectives and outcomes be considered first when preparing a contract, and those be drafted as outcomes the contract performance is to achieve. While the business world has followed this idea for decades, legal drafting in some cases has not caught up. We have been using this strategy with very successful results in everything from manufacturing equipment, management agreements, hardware and software contracts.

So with your lawyers as with any other supplier – start with what you want as the end result! For more information, talk to your local MSI Global Alliance advisor.

 

Search for your local professionals

To find your local member, please use one of the options below:

Select a member from the following list

X
X

 

Contact Us

To contact one of our member firms in Australia and New Zealand, please complete the form below. All emails sent via this website are monitored on a daily basis.

Send us a Message

Please leave this field empty.

Please select a member firm from the map below to contact them directly:


Members Map
To view our global listings, please click here.